State v. Chambliss
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.
{¶ 1} Today, this court must decide whether the denial of retained counsel of choice prior to trial in a criminal case is a final, appealable order. As a general matter, we first caution that this case is limited to the issue of removal of retained counsel of choice. The issue whether the removal of appointed counsel is a final, appealable order may involve different considerations that have not been briefed in this case. We leave that issue for another day.
{¶ 2} Further, we are examining only the issue whether the denial of retained counsel of choice is a final, appealable order. The merits…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Gonzalez-LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Flanagan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State ex rel. Keenan v. CalabreseOhio Supreme Court · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- State v. AndersonOhio Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. GordonOhio Supreme Court · 2018
- Wilhelm-Kissinger v. KissingerOhio Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. AndrewsOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. MillerOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.