Legal Opinion

State v. Chambliss

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 2011No. 2008-2251PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.

{¶ 1} Today, this court must decide whether the denial of retained counsel of choice prior to trial in a criminal case is a final, appealable order. As a general matter, we first caution that this case is limited to the issue of removal of retained counsel of choice. The issue whether the removal of appointed counsel is a final, appealable order may involve different considerations that have not been briefed in this case. We leave that issue for another day.

{¶ 2} Further, we are examining only the issue whether the denial of retained counsel of choice is a final, appealable order. The merits…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. United States v. Gonzalez-LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Flanagan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. State ex rel. Keenan v. CalabreseOhio Supreme Court · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State v. AndersonOhio Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State v. GordonOhio Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Wilhelm-Kissinger v. KissingerOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State v. AndrewsOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. State v. MillerOhio Court of Appeals · 2015

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API