Legal Opinion

Betts v. Brady

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 1, 1942No. 837PublishedCited by 1,112 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Roberts

The petitioner was indicted for robbery in the Circuit Court of Carroll County, Maryland. Due to lack of funds, he was unable to employ counsel, and so informed the judge at his arraignment. He requested that counsel be appointed for him. The j udge advised him that this would not be done, as it was not the practice in Carroll County to appoint counsel for indigent defendants, save in prosecutions for murder and rape.

Without waiving his asserted right to counsel, the petitioner pleaded not guilty and elected to be tried without a jury. At his request witnesses were summoned in his behalf. He…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited81 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Palko v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Hurtado v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1884

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,112 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

1,107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API