Legal Opinion

Caton v. Andalusia Nat. Bank

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 18, 1927No. 4 Div. 335PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The plaintiff in the circuit court, as transferee, sued the defendant on a negotiable promissory note, and as appears from the opinion of the Court of Appeals, defendant sought to show payment to the payee as agent of the plaintiff, and his evidence offered for that purpose was rejected by the circuit court. In affirming that this ruling was free from error, the Court of Appeals stated the rule to be that:

“If the payee be- shown to be the agent of the transferee to accept payment of the paper, and payment be shown to have been made to the payee as such authorized agent the case would be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Postal Tel. Cable Co. v. MinderhoutSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  2. Campbell v. GowansUtah Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Thompson v. WareSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  4. Hughes v. CliftonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  5. Polytinsky v. WilsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Corinth Bank & Trust Co. v. CochranSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  2. Michie v. BradshawSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. Corinth Bank & Trust Co. v. WallaceAlabama Court of Appeals · 1927
  4. Lawler v. Corinth Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  5. Metropolitan Life Ins. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API