Legal Opinion

Corinth Bank & Trust Co. v. Cochran

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 21, 1929No. 6 Div. 301PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOÜLDIN, J.

The holder of collaterals to secure a loan, whether a banker or other lender, has the unquestioned power to select agents to collect and invest them with such authority as he shall determine. He may authorize the collection of collaterals still in possession of the principal. However unbusinesslike it may be, he may confer on his debtor and the indorser of such collaterals full power to make collections without possession thereof. No writing is essential to the creation of such agency. It may be proven in the same way as other issues of fact; the evidence being weighed in the light…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Roberts v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  2. Montgomery B. & T. Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  3. Navco Hardwood Co. v. BassSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  4. Calkins v. VaughanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  5. First National Bank v. First National BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Alfa Mut. General Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  2. Denson v. Kirkpatrick Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  3. Harrell v. Alabama Farm Bureau Mutual Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
  4. Yanago v. Aetna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1935
  5. Franklin Life Ins. Co. v. BrantleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1936

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API