Legal Opinion

Corinth Bank & Trust Co. v. Wallace

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided November 1, 1927No. 6 Div. 70PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRice, J.

This was a suit by appellant, as transferee for value, against appellee upon a promissory note executed by appellee to one J. J. Lawler.

Appellant’s testimony was to the effect that it was an innocent purchaser' for value of the note in question, and that same was unpaid, while appellee’s testimony'was to the effect that he had fully paid the note to the said Lawler, who was expressly authorized by appellant to collect same, and was to the further effect that the proceeds of the collection were by Lawler paid over to appellant.

A very great, and, to our way of thinking, unnecessarily large,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Roberts v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  2. Campbell v. GowansUtah Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Thompson v. WareSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  4. Caton v. Andalusia Nat. BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Corinth Bank & Trust Co. v. CochranSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  2. Corinth Bank & Trust Co. v. LawlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  3. Sullivan v. LawlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  4. Corinth Bank & Trust Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API