Legal Opinion
United States v. Brown Shoe Company
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided November 20, 1959No. 10527(3)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
179 F.Supp. 721 (1959)
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff,
v.
BROWN SHOE COMPANY and G. R. Kinney Co., Inc., and G. R. Kinney Corporation, Defendants.
No. 10527(3).
United States District Court E. D. Missouri, E. D.
November 20, 1959.
Harry Richards, U. S. Atty., St. Louis, Mo., James J. Coyle, Bill G. Andrews, Lewis J. Ottaviani, Nicolaus Bruns, Jr., Edward M. Medvene, Antitrust Division, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.
Robert H. McRoberts and Edwin S. Taylor, Bryan, Cave, McPheeters & McRoberts, St. Louis, Mo., Arthur H. Dean, Henry N. Ess, III, Dennis C. Mahoney, Robin T.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Hamilton Watch Co. v. Benrus Watch Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- Standard Oil Co. of California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. Ingersoll-Rand CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1963
- SmithKline Corp. v. Eli Lilly & Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
- A. G. Spalding & Bros., Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
- Copperweld Corporation v. ImetalDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
- United States v. Wilson Sporting Goods Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.