Legal Opinion
SmithKline Corp. v. Eli Lilly & Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 2, 1976No. Civ. A. 75-1102PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HIGGINBOTHAM, A. L., Jr., District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The plaintiff, SmithKline Corporation (“SmithKline”), instituted this antitrust action against the defendant, Eli Lilly and Company (“Lilly”), for purported violations of sections one, two and three of the Sherman Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. §§ l, 1 2, 2 and 3, 3 and for an alleged violation of section three of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 14. 4 The plaintiff and defendant corporations are major manufacturers of prescription pharmaceuticals, engaged in both interstate and foreign commerce. This complaint was occasioned by the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Lepage's Incorporated v. 3m (Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Smithkline Corporation v. Eli Lilly and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Cascade Health Solutions v. PeaceHealthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Barr Laboratories, Inc. v. Abbott LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1981
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.