Legal Opinion
United States v. Wilson Sporting Goods Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided July 2, 1968No. 68 C 549PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
MAROVITZ, District Judge.
Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction
The Government brings this action under Section 15 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. Sec. 25, to enjoin a proposed merger between the defendant Wilson Sporting Goods Company (hereinafter “Wilson”), a subsidiary of Ling-Temco-Vought, Inc., (hereinafter “LTV”), and the defendant Nissen Corporation (hereinafter “Nissen”), on the ground that it would violate Section 7 of the Clayton Act, as amended by the Celler- Kefauver Amendment, 64 Stat. 1125, 15 U.S.C. See. 18. 1
On March 28, 1968, we issued a temporary…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- American Tobacco Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Federal Trade Commission v. Dean Foods Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. Philadelphia National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Weyerhaeuser CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Company v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Atlantic Richfield CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- United States v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1969
- Elco Corporation v. Microdot Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1973
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.