Legal Opinion
United States v. Ingersoll-Rand Company
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 11, 1963No. Civ. A. 63-124PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROSENBERG, District Judge.
INTRODUCTORY STATEMENT
Findings of fact, conclusions of law and this opinion are presented subsequent to and in support of the issuance of an order by this Court on the 6th day of March 1963, preliminarily restraining the defendants from consummating agreements contemplating specific corporate acquisitions in the underground coal mining machinery production as a line of commerce in the United States.
On March 4, 1963, a second order was issued denying a proposed modification of the Court’s original order. A supple mental opinion relating to the second order will follow.
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. GriffithSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Standard Oil Co. of California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- United States v. Diapulse Corporation of America, Also Known as the Diapulse Manufacturing Corporation of America, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Ingersoll-Rand Company, Goodman Manufacturing Company, Lee-Norse Company and Galis Electric and MacHine CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963
- Highland Supply Corporation v. Reynolds Metals Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
- Federal Trade Commission v. Weyerhaeuser CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Company v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.