Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Attorney General v. Bradley

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1877PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Information in the nature of a Quo Warranto.

1Opinion of the Court

Marston, J:

The attorney general fled an information against. the respondent, charging him with intruding into, usurping and wrongfully holding and exercising the office of alderman of the eighth ward in the city of East Saginaw.

*448That the respondent was in fact elected, and that he qualified and entered upon the discharge of his official duties, is admitted../ The real controversy grows out of certain legislation annexing South Saginaw with the city of East Saginaw, and it is claimed and set forth that all such legislation was and is in conflict with § 4, Art. IV. of the constitution, in that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. State TreasurerMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  2. People ex rel. Attorney General v. HolihanMichigan Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Attorney General v. CunningamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
  2. People v. PhippinMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  3. State ex rel. Devening v. BartholomewIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  4. In re Fourth Judicial DistrictWyoming Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Commerce-Guardian Trust & Savings Bank v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1924

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API