People ex rel. Attorney General v. Holihan
Michigan Supreme Court
Information in the nature of quo warranto.
1Opinion of the Court
Graves, Ch. J.
This is an information filed by the attorney general against the defendant for intruding into and usurping the office of alderman in the city of Detroit.
The final purpose of the proceeding is to question the constitutional validity of the act entitled “ An act to enlarge the corporate limits of the city of Detroit and to create an additional ward in said city,” approved April 12, 1873; and also an act of the same session to correct this last, entitled “An act to detach certain territory from the townships of Hamtramek and Grosse Point, and to annex the same to the city of…
2Cited by17 opinions
- State ex rel. Attorney General v. CunningamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
- Wheeler v. HerbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Allor v. Board of AuditorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- People ex rel. Agnew v. GrahamIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
- Gildemeister v. LindsayMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.