Molina v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
Indicted for having unlawfully acquired marihuana without having paid the transfer tax imposed thereon by law, defendant was tried to, and convicted by, a jury. Without having moved for a directed verdict, excepted to the charge, or in. any other way challenged the sufficiency of the evidence below, he is here seeking a reversal on the ground that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict.
It is settled law in the federal courts that an appellate court will not consider the sufficiency of the evidence where the question is not raised in the trial court, unless it is plain that the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Marco v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
3Cited by12 opinions
- Gilbert Montemayor Palos v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Battle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
- United States v. Robert Johns and Herman Lee GriffinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- Barshop v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
- Thomas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.