Legal Opinion

Thomas v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 30, 1951No. 13450PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

The three appellants and one other were tried upon an indictment in four counts. At the close of the government’s evidence, which was circumstantial, the defendants offering no evidence, the case was submitted to, and defendants were convicted by the jury on, count one charging a violation of 2810(a) I.R.C., 26 U.S. C.A. § 2810(a), “possession * * * of a * * * distilling apparatus for the production of spiritous liquors set up without having the same registered as required by law.”

On a record containing neither motion for a directed verdict nor any substantial objections made or exceptions…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Molina v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1947
  2. Moore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1947
  3. Icenhour v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Odell Clark v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
  2. Mac T. Hall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
  3. Demos v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
  4. United States v. Theodore Stewart FriesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
  5. Howard Meeks v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API