Legal Opinion
Barshop v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided January 28, 1952No. 13142_1PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McCORD, Circuit Judge.
We have carefully considered appellant’s motion for rehearing and motion for permission to reargue the case. The two counsel for appellant who appeared before our court to argue this case were given 55 minutes in which to be heard. We are of opinion, in view of the fact that counsel were permitted to argue for almost the maximum time allowable under the rules in support of the appeal, that the motion for oral reargument should be and the same is hereby overruled and denied.
On the merits of the case we have re-examined the entire record and voluminous briefs heretofore…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Crawford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- United States v. MascuchCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- Burton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949
- Dean v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1917
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Montgomery v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
- United States v. W. Borden StricklandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Berkovitz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
- McClain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1969
- Dan M. White v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.