Legal Opinion

Select Insurance v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 21, 1990No. D012412PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BENKE, Acting P. J.

Select Insurance Company and Insurance Company of the Pacific Coast (insurers) seek extraordinary relief after the court partially granted a motion for summary adjudication of issues brought by real parties Canine Eye Registration Foundation, Inc., Dolly B. Trauner, individually and as executrix of the estate of Lawrence M. Trauner (collectively CERF). The insurers claim the court erred by finding (1) the insurers had a duty to defend CERF’s adversary, Millwood A. Custer, for antitrust violations and abuse of process in an underlying federal district court action…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  3. CNA Casualty of California v. Seaboard Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. Samson v. Transamerica InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Campbell v. Allstate Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 1963

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Xebec Development Partners, Ltd. v. National Union Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. Torres v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. John E. Ward v. Management Analysis Company Employee Disability Benefit Plan, and Unum Life Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  5. Hirschberg v. Lumbermens Mutual CasualtyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API