Legal Opinion
Hirschberg v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty
District Court, N.D. California
Decided May 7, 1992No. C 91-3776 VRWPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN PART, AND DENYING IN PART.
WALKER, District Judge.
On February 7, 1992, Plaintiffs brought a motion for partial summary judgment against defendant Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company (“Lumbermens”), based on the second cause of action of plaintiffs’ complaint. Plaintiffs claimed that Lumber-mens had a duty to defend plaintiffs under Policy No. 3BN/MF 700 044-01 (“Policy”), and also sought a determination that Exclusion (f) of the Policy had been waived.
I. FACTS.
Plaintiff Hirschberg was the President of plaintiffs Innovative Foods,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
- AIU Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Intel Corporation v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- CNA Casualty of California v. Seaboard Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1986
- Titan Holdings Syndicate, Inc. v. The City of Keene, New HampshireCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- County of Columbia v. Continental InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Martin Marietta Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Legarra v. Federated Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- New Castle County De v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Great Northern Nekoosa Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1996
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.