Marriage of Scott v. Scott

OPINION

FOLEY, Judge.

Petitioner, Kathryn Anne Scott, appeals from the denial of an increase in child support. Appellant argues that the trial court abused its discretion by denying an increase because (1) respondent’s earnings have increased substantially and his expenses have not, (2) the needs of appellant and the children have increased substantially, and (3) the cost of living has increased substantially. We agree. Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded with directions.

FACTS

Under a June 1977 court order, respondent pays $160 per month as child support for the Seotts’ two children,…