Legal Opinion

Hanson v. Emanuel

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 2, 1941No. 32,897PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

In an election contest case the district court made and filed an order on January 21, 1941, that the contestant, Tom Hanson, was entitled to judgment that he was duly elected to the office of trustee of the village of Keewatin for the three-year term commencing on the first secular day in January, 1941, and that the contestee, Domenic Emanuel, was not elected to said office for the term mentioned. On February 20, 1941, an order was made and filed denying the contestee’s motion for amended findings and conclusions of law or for a new trial. The appeal to this court was taken more than five…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Knight v. NorrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1868
  2. State Ex Rel. Boldt v. St. Cloud Milk Producers' Assn.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  3. Schuek v. HagarSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
  4. In Re Trusteeship Under Last Will of RosenfeldtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  5. Moon v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bank v. EganSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  2. Phillips v. EricsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  3. Carl (Al) Aura v. BrandtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  4. Mixed Local of Hotel & Restaurant Employees Union, Local No. 458 v. Hotel & Restaurant Employees International AllianceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  5. M. L. H. and R. E. U. L. No. 458 v. H. R. E. I. A.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API