Legal Opinion

Carl (Al) Aura v. Brandt

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 12, 1941No. 32,946PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The contestee moves to dismiss contestants’ appeal on the ground that they appeal from a nonappealable order.

Carl (Al) Aura and Wallace Brandt were rival candidates for the office of recorder for the village of Hibbing at the election held December 3, 1940. The official canvass gave the election to Brandt. Thereupon Aura and another instituted this contest. The trial resulted in findings of fact and conclusions of law that nine more votes were cast for Aura than for Brandt; hence Brandt was not entitled to the office, nor was Aura entitled thereto in that he and his voluntary election…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hanson v. EmanuelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  2. Dayton-Lee, Inc. v. McGowanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Aura v. BrandtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API