Legal Opinion

Long v. Holland America Line Westours, Inc.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 2001No. S-8726PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRYNER, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Dorice Long sued for personal injuries she sustained during a Holland America tour in Alaska. She filed the suit well within the time limits of Alaska's tort statute of limitations but beyond the limit specified by a clause in her tour contract. Honoring the contract's choice of Washington law, the superior court upheld the limitations clause and dismissed Long's suit as untimely. We reverse. Because this case raises fundamental policy issues that are materially more interesting to Alaska than Washington, Alaska law applies. Under our law, the limitations…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. ShuteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Mary Lousararian v. Royal Caribbean Corp., as Successor in Interest to Royal Caribbean LimitedCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  3. Marks v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc. v. DayAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Dura Corp. v. HarnedAlaska Supreme Court · 1985

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Chris Cardoni v. Prosperity BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
  2. McDonnell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Richard v. Carroll Home Services, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  4. Brotherton v. BrothertonAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Irby v. Fairbanks Gold Mining, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API