Legal Opinion

Richard v. Carroll Home Services, LLC

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 28, 2017No. 85/16PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcDonald, J.

In the court system, a potential plaintiff has an interest in having sufficient time to investigate and assert a claim. A potential defendant has an interest in repose and finality as to whether it will be necessary to mount a defense. The public has an interest in the efficient use of public resources—what, in this context, is sometimes called judicial economy. The Legislature, as the primary policy-making branch of government, weighs those competing interests and establishes statutory limitations periods for bringing claims in court.

Maryland law, nevertheless, allows parties, in some…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Rory v. Continental InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Order of United Commercial Travelers of America v. WolfeSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. RRC Northeast, LLC v. BAA Maryland, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  4. Henning Nelson Construction Co. v. Fireman's Fund American Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  5. Walther v. Sovereign BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Nationstar Mortgage v. KempCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  2. Murphy v. Liberty Mutual Ins.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  3. Gregory Smith v. Wakefield, LPCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019
  4. Daughtry v. NadelCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  5. Hoang v. LoweryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API