Legal Opinion
Cooper v. Kensil
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 2, 1954PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
31 N.J. Super. 87 (1954)
106 A.2d 27
ARTHUR M. COOPER, STANLEY FRANKEL AND MAPLE SHADE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC., PLAINTIFFS,
v.
THEODORE J. KENSIL, CORONET CONSTRUCTION CO., BERLIN GARDENS, INC., BROKERS MORTGAGE SERVICE AND D.V.M. INVESTMENT COMPANY, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.
Decided June 2, 1954.
Mr. Louis B. LeDuc, attorney for plaintiffs.
Mr. George D. Rothermel and Mr. Samuel Kalikman, attorneys for defendants.
HANEMAN, J.S.C.
Plaintiffs herein seek the specific performance of an agreement, under the terms of which they were allegedly afforded an option by the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Atlantic Northern Airlines, Inc. v. SchwimmerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
- Savarese v. Pyrene Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Corn Exchange National Bank & Trust Co., Philadelphia v. TaubelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
- Bullowa v. Thermoid Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
- Proprietors Realty Co. v. WohltmannSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1921
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Goldberg v. Commercial Union Ins. Co. of NYNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
- Acoustics, Inc. v. THE HANOVER INS. CO.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
- Mahoney v. Nitroform Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
- Cooper v. KensilNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
- Northwest Bergen County Utilities Authority v. Borough of Midland ParkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992