Legal Opinion

Cooper v. Kensil

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided December 20, 1954PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

33 N.J. Super. 410 (1954)

110 A.2d 559

ARTHUR M. COOPER AND STANLEY FRANKEL, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

v.

THEODORE J. KENSIL, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued December 13, 1954.

Decided December 20, 1954.

Before Judges CLAPP, JAYNE and FRANCIS.

Mr. Louis B. LeDuc argued the cause for the appellants.

Mr. George D. Rothermel argued the cause for the respondent (Mr. Samuel Kalikman, of counsel).

2Per curiam

The judgment appealed from is affirmed for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Haneman reported in 31 N.J. Super. 87 (Ch. Div. 1954).

It may be noted also as a…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Montclair Distributing Co. v. Arnold Bakers, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1948
  2. Cline v. KurzweilNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948
  3. Hardy v. HangenNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
  4. Cooper v. KensilNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
  5. DiCataldo v. Harold Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. Commercial Union Ins. Co. of NYNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
  2. Acoustics, Inc. v. THE HANOVER INS. CO.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
  3. Northwest Bergen County Utilities Authority v. Borough of Midland ParkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API