Legal Opinion
Mahoney v. Nitroform Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 10, 1955PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
36 N.J. Super. 116 (1955)
114 A.2d 863
DOROTHY W. MAHONEY, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,
v.
NITROFORM COMPANY, INC., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued May 23, 1955.
Decided June 10, 1955.
Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and CONFORD.
Mr. Isidor Kalisch argued the cause for respondent-appellant.
Mr. Alexander Avidan argued the cause for petitioner-respondent (Messrs. Avidan & Avidan, attorneys).
The opinion of the court was delivered by CONFORD, J.A.D.
This is a review of concurring conclusions of the Essex County Court and the Division of Workmen's Compensation…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Bryant v. FissellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
- Vogt Ex Rel. Vogt v. Borough of BelmarSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Savarese v. Pyrene Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Claim of Bowne v. S. W. Bowne Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- C. B. Snyder Realty Co. v. National Newark & Essex Banking Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Toft v. KetchumSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
- Cerniglia v. PassaicNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- Brown v. Jamesburg State Home for BoysNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- Page v. FEDERATED METALS DIV., AMER. SMELT. & REF., CO.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Drake v. County of EssexNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.