Legal Opinion
In re Itel Securities Litigation
District Court, N.D. California
Decided January 22, 1981No. C 79-2168 RPAPublishedCited by 73 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
AGUILAR, District Judge.
This action is before the Court on plaintiffs’ motion to certify certain proposed classes of defendants.
Past and present shareholders of Itel Corporation bring the instant action against *107Itel Corporation; certain officers and directors of Itel; Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co., Itel’s accountants; and the investment bankers who acted as the underwriters of two Itel public security offerings in 1978. The Consolidated Amended Supplemental Complaint1 alleges violations of §§ 11, 12 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. §§ 77k, 77l, 77o), violations…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- William Harris v. Palm Springs Alpine Estates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Robert La Mar v. H & B Novelty & Loan Company, Ronald J. Kinsling v. Allegheny AirlinesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,213 Hill York Corporation v. American International Franchises, Inc., Gurn H. FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Washington v. LeeDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1966
- In Re Caesars Palace Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- Millan v. Cascade Water Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2015
- Clark v. McDonald's Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2003
- In re Consumers Power Co. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1985
- Hokama v. EF Hutton & Co., Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1983
- Monterrubio v. Best Buy Stores, L.P.District Court, E.D. California · 2013
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.