Legal Opinion
Hokama v. EF Hutton & Co., Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided June 17, 1983No. CV 82-6330 MRP. MDL No. 541PublishedCited by 78 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
PFAELZER, District Judge.
Defendants’ motions to dismiss and for summary judgment came on regularly for hearing on April 18,1983 before the Honorable Mariana R. Pfaelzer. The Court, having considered the papers filed and oral arguments made, now files this Memorandum, which shall constitute its Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs are “Type A” limited partners in defendant Wellspring Barge Limited Partnership (“the Partnership”), a limited partnership organized for the purpose of owning and operating river barges. Defendant Wellspring Energy Co.…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,697 John P. Decker v. Massey-Ferguson, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Clarence E. Bennett v. Kenneth Berg, Dan R. Sandford, Jr. v. Kenneth BergCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by78 opinions
- Moore v. Kayport Package Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Gerritsen v. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
- Neilson v. Union Bank of California, N.A.District Court, C.D. California · 2003
- SEDIMA, S.P.R.L., Appellant, v. IMREX COMPANY, INC., Gidon Armon and Jacob Armon, AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Bernard A. Schlifke and Harvey Kallick, D/B/A K & S Investments Co., a Partnership v. Seafirst Corp. And Seattle-First National BankCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.