Legal Opinion

Quick v. Coale, Cooley, Lietz, McInerny & Broadus, P.C.

District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Decided December 12, 2002No. 1:01-CV-01007PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER

OSTEEN, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on Defendant Coale, Cooley, Lietz, Mclnerny & Broa-dus, P.C., d/b/a Coale Cooley Lietz Mclner-ny, John P. Coale’s, Diane Cooley’s and David Lietz’s (“Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(3) (“Rule 12(b)(3)”). This court will deny Defendants’ motion to dismiss because of the well-established rule that 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a), rather than 28 U.S.C. § 1391, governs venue of removed cases, and therefore, the Middle District of North Carolina is the proper venue for this…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pt United Can Company Ltd. v. Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc., F/k/a Continental Can Company Richard Krzyzanowski John W. ConwayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  2. Polizzi v. Cowles Magazines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Warren Bros. v. Community Building Corp. of Atlanta, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1974
  4. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Herzog Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1998
  5. Tanglewood Mall, Inc. v. CHASE MANHATTAN BK.(NAT. ASS'N)District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1974

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Motley Rice, LLC v. Baldwin & Baldwin, LLPDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2007
  2. IHFC Properties, LLC v. APA Marketing, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2012
  3. Docrx, Inc. v. Dox Consulting, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API