Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Herzog Services, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
McBRYDE, District Judge.
Came on for consideration the motion of defendant, Herzog Services, Inc., to transfer venue. The court, having considered the motion, the response of plaintiff, Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Company, the record, and applicable authorities, finds that the motion should be denied.
Defendant argues that venue is to be determined pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(a) and that venue is not proper here because defendant neither resides here nor did a substantial part of the events giving rise to plaintiffs claims occur here. As the United States Supreme Court has…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Time, Inc. v. Frank ManningCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- Allen Peteet, Ann I. Greenhill, Individually and on Behalf of the Heirs of the Estate of James Edward Greenhill, Deceased v. Dow Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- Polizzi v. Cowles Magazines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Seaboard Rice Milling Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Bacik v. PeekDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- International Truck and Engine Corp. v. QuintanaDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2003
- Allied Van Lines, Inc. v. Aaron Transfer & Storage, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2002
- Quick v. Coale, Cooley, Lietz, McInerny & Broadus, P.C.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2002
- Choice Exploration Inc v. Gemini Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2021
- Choice Exploration Inc v. Gemini Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2021
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.