Legal Opinion

Frank v. Solomon

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1963No. 7237PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Vice Chief Justice.

In the trial below plaintiff, an attorney, was granted judgment on the pleadings for the sum of $8,575. This allegedly represented reasonable attorneys’ fee for legal service given the defendant in an earlier action, less a sum already paid. Defendant appeals.

Plaintiff alleged in the complaint, inter alia, that reasonable value of the services rendered for defendant was $8,750 of which $175 had been paid. Defendant answered admitting the payment of $175, denying and admitting certain other specific allegations, and denying that reasonable value of attorneys’ fee was…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Beverage v. Canton Placer Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Scott & Payne v. Potomac Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Crouch v. PixlerArizona Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Victory v. ManningCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  5. Boyle v. WebbArizona Supreme Court · 1939

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cagle v. CarrArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Prior v. RathjenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  3. Harbel Oil Company v. SteeleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  4. In Re TrullCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
  5. Trull v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API