Legal Opinion

Scott & Payne v. Potomac Insurance Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1959PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.

The trial court awarded plaintiffs a judgment against defendant for amounts expended by plaintiffs to settle a claim against plaintiffs for alleged malpractice on their part as professional architects. Plaintiffs were the named insureds in “Architect’s Professional Liability” policies issued by defendant. This action is founded on these policies. For convenience we will refer to them as “policy.” Defendant denied any liability within the terms of its policies for the claim made against plaintiffs. Defendant appeals. We will review the facts before mentioning the assignments of error.

During…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lytle v. Payette-Oregon Slope Irrigation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Moulton v. HuckleberryOregon Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Olson v. McAteeOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Morford v. California-Western States Life InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Hubert v. AitkenNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1889

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. St. Joseph Hospital v. Corbetta Construction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  2. Miller v. DeWittAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  3. City of Mounds View v. WalijarviSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  4. City of Eveleth v. RubleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  5. Mignot v. ParkhillOregon Supreme Court · 1964

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API