Legal Opinion

In Re Marmaduke

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 22, 1931No. Docket No. 2052PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.

Pursuant to the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus herein, a return was filed by the respondent in which not only the facts set forth in the petition for the writ were controverted, but as well other facts were alleged which found ample support in the evidence taken in a proceeding in the juvenile court wherein the case of the minor child of petitioner was heard, and whose order in the premises is made one of the objects of attack by petitioner.

On the return day of the writ, it appearing that certain issues of fact were involved and which prior to reaching a conclusion regarding the merits…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  2. In Re Application of GutierrezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  3. Kuhland v. SedgwickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  4. Cobe v. CraneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Watson v. Columbia Basin Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Marr v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  2. In Re StaserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API