Legal Opinion

Watson v. Columbia Basin Development Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 13, 1913No. Civ. No. 1094PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tuolumne County and from an order refusing to set the judgment aside. G. W. Nicol, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. W. P. Caubu, Rowan Hardin, and Stafford & Stafford, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

This is an appeal from the judgment and also from an order denying a motion to set it aside.

There is no pretense of error as to anything occurring antecedent to the rendition of the judgment unless possibly in reference to the refusal of the court to postpone the time of trial. This circumstance, however, is properly reviewable and will be considered in the determination of the question whether the court abused its discretion in declining to set aside the judgment.

The judgment recites that “This cause came on regularly for trial on the 12th day of July, 1912, J. C. Webster, Esq., appearing as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. LeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Nicoll v. WeldonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Moore v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Grady v. DonahooCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Miller v. CarrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Waybright v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. People v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Wooley v. WickerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Olsen v. J. J. Jacobs Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. Estate of TriestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API