Legal Opinion

Berlin v. Boedecker

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1994No. 93-315PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hunt

Defendants Brett A. Boedecker and Boedecker Resources, Inc., appeal from a judgment of the Eleventh Judicial District Court, Flathead County, granting respondents Martha Berlin and Donald Peterson damages for their losses in two overriding royalty purchases, and finding that Brett Boedecker breached the parties’ oral contract and his fiduciary duty to respondents, and piercing the corporate veil.

We affirm.

The parties raise the following issues:

1. Was respondents’ action barred by the doctrine of res judicata?

2. Was respondents’ action barred by the doctrine of collateral estoppel?

3. Was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Interstate Production Credit Ass'n v. DesayeMontana Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Drilcon, Inc. v. Roil Energy Corp., Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Stapleton v. First Security BankMontana Supreme Court · 1983
  4. In Re the Marriage of StoutMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Davis v. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day SaintsMontana Supreme Court · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Lorang v. Fortis InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Citizens Awareness Network v. Montana Board of Environmental ReviewMontana Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Robinson v. First Wyoming Bank, NAMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  4. HKM Associates v. Northwest Pipe Fittings, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Balyeat Law, PC v. HatchMontana Supreme Court · 1997

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API