Legal Opinion

State v. Franco

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided August 10, 2004No. 23,719PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VIGIL, J.

{1} Defendant was convicted of one count of possession of a controlled substance (cocaine) and one count of tampering with evidence (cocaine). NMSA 1978, § 30-31-23 .(1990); NMSA 1978, § 30-22-5 (2003). She appeals, contending that: (1) fundamental error was committed when the trial court failed to instruct the jury that her presence in the vicinity of the cocaine or her knowledge of the existence or location of the cocaine, is not, by itself, possession; (2) the failure of her attorney to request the instruction on constructive possession or to object to the instruction given…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Swafford v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. SutphinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. BarberNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1942

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. FrancoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. FrancoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. BoergadineNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Salazar v. TorresNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. LopezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API