Legal Opinion
State v. Wildgrube
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided June 23, 2003No. 21,956PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WECHSLER, Chief Judge.
{1} Defendant David Wildgrube appeals his conviction and sentence for homicide by vehicle in violation of NMSA 1978, § 66-8-101 (1991). Defendant challenges his conviction on the grounds of insufficient evidence to support the conviction, errors in the admission of evidence, prosecutorial misconduct, and errors in sentencing. He also contends that the State is bound by a post-trial agreement between the district attorney and Defendant. We affirm the conviction and sentence.
Background
{2} Late in the evening of September 10, 1999, after leaving a local bar called…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Greer v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Allen v. LeMasterNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. AndazolaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. MontoyaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
- State v. GarciaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
- State v. ZamoraNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.