Upasani v. State Farm General Ins. Co. CA4/3
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FYBEL, J.
Introduction
Meera Upasani and Mohan Upasani, policyholders of State Farm General Insurance Company and State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (collectively, State Farm), were sued for conspiring to aid a mother in abducting her son from his father. State Farm denied the Upasanis’ tender of the defense of that action because abduction claims were not covered claims under the terms of the State Farm policies. The Upasanis sued, and the trial court granted State Farm’s motion for summary judgment.
We affirm. State Farm offered admissible evidence showing the claimed loss suffered in…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
- Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
- Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Lucido v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Marble Bridge Funding Group, Inc. v. Euler Hermes American Credit Indemnity Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
- Dong Su v. Henry Global Consulting GroupDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2022
- Estate of Xander Mann v. County of StanislausDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- Gorzela v. State Farm General Insurance Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2016
- Hetman v. Cal. Capital Ins. CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.