Ackerley Communications, Inc. v. City of Seattle
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*907Horowitz, J.
This appeal in consolidated actions for a declaratory judgment and injunctive relief raises the question whether Seattle ordinance No. 90138 as amended by ordinance No. 97025 (the Ordinance) is valid as applied to respondent billboard owners. We hold that it is, and therefore reverse.
The Seattle Ordinance, enacted in 1968, is a part of the coordinated efforts of federal, state and local governments to preserve the natural beauty of our nation's scenic vistas and to protect the public health and safety on the highways by means of regulating the placement, size, etc., of outdoor…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Aircraft & Diesel Equipment Corp. v. HirschSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Public Util. Comm'n of Cal. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Sorenson v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- Diversified Industries Development Corp. v. RipleyWashington Supreme Court · 1973
- Markham Advertising Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1968
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Allingham v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Presbytery of Seattle v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- South Hollywood Hills Citizens Ass'n v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Orion Corporation v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1985
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.