James William Nipp v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Per curiam
Appellant pleaded guilty to a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2312. He seeks relief from the sentence imposed and asserts mental incompetence at the time of the guilty plea. The trial court treated his petition for coram nobis as an application under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and denied it without a hearing.
A claim of mental incompetence at the time of a guilty plea may be raised under § 2255 and, when raised, may not be disposed of without a hearing. See Ellison v. United States, 10 Cir., 324 F.2d 710, decided today. As in Ellison we direct the attention of the trial court to the admonitions appearing in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- MacHibroda v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Ralph Bryan Ellison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
3Cited by10 opinions
- Fanklin Delano Floyd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- United States v. Raymond MirandaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Edwin B. Butler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
- Billy Mason Eskridge v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
- Berl Estes McDonald v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.