Legal Opinion

Berl Estes McDonald v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 3, 1965No. 7922_1PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.

The trial court denied without hearing appellant’s motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 from a 10-year sentence imposed on his plea of guilty to a charge of assault with intent to murder. At the time of the commission of the crime appellant- was an inmate of the United States penitentiary at Leavenworth, Kansas. One of the grounds asserted for relief is mental incompetence at the time of a guilty plea. When such a claim is raised the § 2255 motion may not be disposed of without a hearing. See Nipp v. United States, 10 Cir., 324 F.2d 711, and Ellison v. United…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ralph Bryan Ellison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
  2. James William Nipp v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Raymond MirandaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
  2. Edwin B. Butler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
  3. Chester A. Schutz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
  4. Berl Estes McDonald v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
  5. Paul Handy Nunley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API