Legal Opinion

Billy Mason Eskridge v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 7, 1971No. 158-70PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLOWAY, Circuit Judge.

We have considered a petition for rehearing en banc and motion to supplement the record on appeal. While the Court has concluded that rehearing en banc is not justified, the panel which heard the appeal has concluded that there is merit to the Government’s position. The motion to supplement the record was not opposed and we grant that motion and have considered the supplemental record. For reasons that will be detailed below, we conclude that our original opinion, which remanded for a hearing on competency at the time of entry of pleas of guilty, should be withdrawn…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Gene A. Krupnick v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1959
  5. Maurice Anton Kienlen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Monty P. Sena v. New Mexico State Prison Attorney General State of New MexicoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  2. Jack Edgar McBride v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
  3. William A. Greenfield v. J. P. Gunn, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  4. Elvin Emmett Moore v. Park J. Anderson, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
  5. United States v. NelsonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API