Legal Opinion

Matsuda v. Luond

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 2, 1942No. Civ. 2838PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment awarding each plaintiff, separately, damages for injuries suffered in an automobile accident which happened at about 9 o’clock on the morning of June 29, 1940, on Highway 101, a little less than a mile north of Encinitas in San Diego County.

Buntaro Matsuda is a foreign-born Japanese subject who was, and had been, a resident of San Diego County. Toshi Matsuda, 17 years of age, and Satoshi Matsuda, 15 years of age, his sons, were both born in this country and are citizens of the United States. On July 25, 1940, Buntaro Matsuda was appointed guardian ad litem of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. See v. North American Accident InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Juchert v. California Water Service Co.California Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Dingman v. AF Mattock CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Techt v. . HughesNew York Court of Appeals · 1920

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mathers v. County of RiversideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Arques v. National Superior Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945
  3. Poe v. LawrenceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Wilkerson v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. KaiserOregon Supreme Court · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API