Legal Opinion
Carballo Rodriguez v. Clark Equipment Co.
District Court, D. Puerto Rico
Decided June 6, 2001No. Civil 99-1446(JP)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
PIERAS, Senior District Judge.
The Court has before it Defendants Clark Equipment Company (“Clark”), In-gersoll-Rand Company, Volvo Construction Equipment North America, Inc., and the Dial Corporation’s (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion in Limine to Preclude Plaintiffs’ Expert Witness Raymond R. Hagglund (docket No. 135) and Plaintiffs’ Opposition thereto (docket No. 138).
Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence governs the admissibility of expert testimony. It provides: “If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Eduardo Burkhart v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Vinal S. DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- CHAPMAN EX REL. EST. OF CHAPMAN v. Bernard's Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
- Figueroa v. Simplicity Plan De Puerto RicoDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2003
- Carrelo v. ADVANCED NEUROMODULATION SYSTEMS, INC.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2011
- Aislyn Batista Acevedo, Ina Ruth Kessler Krugman, and minor A.D.S.B. v. Doctors’ Center Hospital Bayamón and Presbyterian Community Hospital Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2026
- Dachman v. Maestre-GrauDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2023
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.