Legal Opinion
United States v. Mills
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 19, 1999No. 98-1378PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.
Following a jury trial, Stephen S. Mills was convicted of depriving a federal prisoner of his Eighth Amendment right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 242. On appeal, Mills contends the district court erred by: (1) admitting a videotape as evidence; (2) refusing to permit certain sidebar conferences and overruling certain objections as untimely; and (3) increasing his sentence for obstruction of justice. Mills also contends that he received ineffective assistance of counsel due to his counsel’s failure to move for a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. George Don GallowayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Martin Cardenas, A/K/A Raul RamirezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. MaglebyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. DurhamCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. ContrerasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Douglas Lumir StolbaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. McGovernCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.