United States v. Contreras
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
McCONNELL, Circuit Judge.
This case considers a matter of first impression for this circuit: whether the Sentencing Guidelines enhancement for obstruction of justice, United States Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 3C1.1 (2002), applies when a defendant’s obstructive conduct occurred during the prosecution of state charges preceding the federal indictment, but both federal and state charges were based on the same underlying conduct. We hold that, in this case, it does. We also hold that the search of Ms. Contreras’s car did not violate her constitutional rights. Accordingly, we affirm both the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- California v. CarneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Carlos Botero-OspinaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- United States v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- State v. MorlockSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.