Legal Opinion

United States v. Contreras

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided October 31, 2007No. 06-4144PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCONNELL, Circuit Judge.

This case considers a matter of first impression for this circuit: whether the Sentencing Guidelines enhancement for obstruction of justice, United States Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 3C1.1 (2002), applies when a defendant’s obstructive conduct occurred during the prosecution of state charges preceding the federal indictment, but both federal and state charges were based on the same underlying conduct. We hold that, in this case, it does. We also hold that the search of Ms. Contreras’s car did not violate her constitutional rights. Accordingly, we affirm both the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. California v. CarneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. United States v. Carlos Botero-OspinaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. United States v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  2. United States v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  3. United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  4. United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  5. State v. MorlockSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API