Legal Opinion
In Re the Arbitration of Certain Differences Between A/S Ganger Rolf & Zeeland Transportation, Ltd.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 20, 1961PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FREDERICK van PELT BRYAN, District Judge.
This is a proceeding to compel arbitration under Sections 4, 5 and 6 of the United States Arbitration Act (9 U.S.C. §§ 4, 5 and 6).
Petitioners have moved for an order directing respondent Zeeland Transportation, Ltd. (Zeeland) to appoint an arbitrator within a period to be fixed by the court, and in the event of Zeeland’s failure to do so for appointment by the court of an arbitrator to act on its behalf.
The application is based upon the petition to compel arbitration which alleges in .substance the following:
Petitioners are all Norwegian corporations…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Robert Lawrence Company, Inc. v. Devonshire Fabrics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Kulukundis Shipping Co. v. Amtorg Trading Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Kentucky River Mills v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
- Standard Magnesium Corp. v. FuchsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
- TEXAS EASTERN TRANSMISSION CORPORATION v. BarnardDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1959
3Cited by18 opinions
- Janmort Leasing, Inc. v. Econo-Car International, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1979
- Hilton Oil Transp. v. Oil Transp. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Orion Shipping & Trading Co. v. Eastern States Petroleum Corp. of Panama, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Aaacon Auto Transport, Inc. v. BarnesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- International Patent Development Corp. v. Wyomont PartnersDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1980
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.