Legal Opinion
TEXAS EASTERN TRANSMISSION CORPORATION v. Barnard
District Court, E.D. Kentucky
Decided September 29, 1959No. 5:09-misc-05016PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HIRAM CHURCH FORD, Chief Judge.
This action arises under the United States Arbitration Act, Title 9 U.S.C.A. §§ 1 through 14. The case is submitted for judgment in chief upon issues disclosed by the pleadings, affidavits and exhibits filed, constituting the record herein.
Defendants are the owners of certain tracts of land in Bath and Montgomery counties, Kentucky, across which the plaintiff, Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation, in May, 1957, obtained easements under authority of the Natural Gas Act, Title 15 U.S.C.A. § 717 for the purpose of laying pipelines for transmission of natural gas…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mitchell v. C. W. Vollmer & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Kentucky River Mills v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
- James P. Mitchell, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Empire Gas Engineering CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- Southern Pacific Co. v. GileoSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re the Arbitration of Certain Differences Between A/S Ganger Rolf & Zeeland Transportation, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1961
- Limar Enterprises, Inc. v. Govt. of the Virgin IslandsSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 1996
- Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969