State v. Olaiz
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
*382ROSSMAN, J.
Defendant appeals his conviction for delivery of a controlled substance, ORS 475.992, assigning as error the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress. He challenges the validity of the traffic stop that led to seizure of the evidence on the grounds that it was not authorized under ORS 810.410 and that it was a “pretext stop,” in violation of Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution and the Fourth Amendment. We affirm.
We take the facts from the trial court’s findings. Ball v. Gladden, 250 Or 485, 487-88, 443 P2d 621 (1968). While police narcotics officers Anderson and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. CaraherOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. TannerOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. FloranceOregon Supreme Court · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. LopezUtah Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. BoltonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
- State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- State v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1992
- State v. MesaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.