Legal Opinion
United States v. Gerber
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 10, 1949No. Civ. No. 8946PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARD, District Judge.
The complaint filed by the Government alleges that the defendants have entered into unlawful agreements in restraint of interstate trade, in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act1 and Section 3 of the Clayton Act 2 . The case is now before me on the defendants’ motion to quash service of process or, in the alternative, to transfer this cause to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division.
The defendant Max Gerber, a resident of Chicago, Illinois, operating under the trade name of Gerber Enterprises, has his principal place…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- United States v. Scophony Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. National City Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. National City Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1948
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sandvik, Inc. v. Continental Ins. Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
- Brown v. WoodringDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1959
- Biedrzycki v. Alcoa Steamship Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
- Leppard v. Jordan's Truck LineDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1953
- United States v. Switzer Bros.District Court, N.D. California · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.