Legal Opinion

State v. Bevacqua

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1946No. 30684 and 30685PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

The defendant, appellant herein, does not complain of the judgments of reversal, but contends that the appellate court erred in refusing his request to fix bail in reduced amounts and in leaving the reduction thereof to the trial court upon remand.

This court takes the position that these cases may be disposed of by determining whether the refusals of the trial court to reduce bail were final orders appeal-able to the Court of Appeals.

Ordinarily an order made prior to or during the trial is not final and cannot be made the basis of an appeal; but here there are two elements which it might be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. KnollmanOhio Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Wagner v. LongOhio Supreme Court · 1937
  3. In Re StegmanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932
  4. Jones v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. BillyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. In Re GentryOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. State ex rel. Baker v. TroutmanOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. PattersonOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. In re DeFronzoOhio Supreme Court · 1977

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API