Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Baker v. Troutman

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1990No. 89-2044PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Per curiam

We agree that Miscellaneous Order No. 555 of the Court of Common Pleas of Summit County violates Section 9, Article I of the Ohio Constitution,1 as implemented by Crim. R. 46,2 and have *272granted a writ of habeas corpus ordering Baker’s release on the posting of a $5,000 bond and a peremptory writ of mandamus in the first instance requiring respondents to nullify Miscellaneous Order No. 555.

First we reject respondents’ arguments that Baker has no action in habeas corpus. In State v. Bevacqua (1946), 147 Ohio St. 20, 33 O.O. 186, 67 N.E. 2d 786, we held that habeas corpus is the proper method of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. State ex rel. Liberty Mills, Inc. v. LockerOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. BevacquaOhio Supreme Court · 1946
  4. United States v. Joseph RoseCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
  5. Locke v. JenkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1969

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pirman v. MoneyOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Smith v. LeisOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State ex rel. Smirnoff v. GreeneOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State ex rel. Jones v. HendonOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. PattersonOhio Court of Appeals · 1996

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API